Nvidia Geforce GTX TITAN-X Official Specifications Leaked - Launching in 24 Hours
The official specifications of the Geforce GTX TITAN-X have just been unveiled courtesy of Videocardz.com. The specifications all lucifer with what we have leaked so far, with no surprises equally far as nosotros tin see. That said, the GM200 is an absolute beast with 3072 CUDA cores and Nvidia's Maxwell Architecture. There is some specification inconsistency mentioned by the source which I have accounted for below.
Nvidia's official poster showing tomorrow as the official launch appointment of the TITAN-X. @Nvidia Public
The GM200 debuts with twice the core count and of the GM204
This occasion deserves the customary preliminaries I think. Equally virtually of y'all know the TITAN-X is the adjacent iteration in the Nvidia serial of TITAN branded GPUs. These form the semi-professional spectrum of Green'due south offering yet are still marketed to gamers for some inexplicable reason. The TITAN-X houses the GM200 cadre, which is the successor of the GM204; and fondly referred to as big daddy Maxwell past dark-green fans. 1 of the major problems with the GM204 core was the lack of FP64 functioning and if the GM200 can successfully address that, the bill of fare will become a worth successor to the GK110 based Titan-original. Anyways, here are the specifications leaked with the inconsistency highlighted with an asterisk:
NVIDIA GeForce GTX Titan X Terminal Specification Comparison Chart:
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX Titan X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX Titan Black | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 | |
| GPU Compages | Maxwell | Kepler | Maxwell | Maxwell | Maxwell |
| GPU Proper noun | GM200 | GK110 | GM204 | GM204 | GM206 |
| Die Size | TBC | 561mm2 | 398mm2 | 398mm2 | 228mm2 |
| Process | 28nm | 28nm | 28nm | 28nm | 28nm |
| CUDA Cores | 3072 | 2880 | 2048 | 1664 | 1024 |
| Texture Units | 192 | 240 | 128 | 104 | 64 |
| Raster Devices | 96 | 48 | 64 | 64 | 32 |
| Clock Speed | 1002 | 889 MHz | 1126 MHz | 1051 MHz | 1127 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1089 | 980 MHz | 1216 MHz | 1178 MHz | 1178 MHz |
| VRAM | 12GB GDDR5 | 6 GB GDDR5 | four GB GDDR5 | 4 GB GDDR5 | 2 GB GDDR5 |
| Retentivity Bus | 384-bit | 384-bit | 256-bit | 256-bit | 128-scrap |
| Retention Clock | 7.0 Ghz | vii.0 GHz | vii.0 GHz | vii.0 GHz | vii.0 GHz |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336.0 | 336.0 GB/due south | 224.0 GB/s | 224.0 GB/due south | 112.0 GB/s |
| TDP | 250W | 250W | 165W | 145W | 120W |
| Power Connectors | eight+6 Pin | 8+6 Pin | Two 6-Pin | Ii 6-Pin | I half dozen-Pin |
| Price | TBC | $999 US | $549 US | $329 United states of america | $199 United states |
One of the things I could not understand in the specifications tabular array released by Videocardz is the fact that firstly, a retention clock of 2000 Mhz is mentioned (8Ghz constructive) only in the table, we still see 1753 Mhz as the memory clock. The bandwidth mentioned is also wrong in that eventuality. Assuming WhyCry is correct most the 2000 Mhz retention clock the following changes to the specification come into effect:
Retention bandwidth is the result of the Memory Clock / 2 (bookkeeping for Double Information Rate) and Multiplying by the Bus Width (you also divide past yard to go the proper conversion unit of measurement). We should therefore get = [2000/2*384/yard] =384GB/s as our actual bandwidth instead of 336 which would be the case if the retentivity clock was 1753.
Finally, looking at the leaked block diagram I tin can make an educated guess that a cut-down GM200 is going to take 20 SMMs and 2560 CUDA Cores. These could characteristic in a futurity GTX 980 Ti or not appear at all. I know for a fact there are engineering samples of cut-GM200 floating around just whether they see the low-cal of mass production remains to be seen. That's all folks.
Source: https://wccftech.com/nvidia-geforce-gtx-titanx-official-specifications-leaked-launching-24-hours/
Posted by: witherswasseene.blogspot.com

0 Response to "Nvidia Geforce GTX TITAN-X Official Specifications Leaked - Launching in 24 Hours"
Post a Comment